Barr Picks Apart Trump’s Indictment: Here’s What They’ll Need To Prove

Photo edit of William Barr and Donald Trump. Original photo credit: The United States Department of Justice. Public Domain, (2023, July 23).
Photo edit of William Barr and Donald Trump. Original photo credit: The United States Department of Justice. Public Domain, (2023, July 23).
Barr’s Changing Perception
  • Notably, this evolution in Barr’s viewpoint is not an indictment of Trump but a reflection of Barr’s own thought process.
  • Bill Barr, former Attorney General, initially held some doubts about Donald Trump’s comprehension of the 2020 election results.
  • During a CNN interview, Barr conceded to a shift in his understanding, now viewing Trump, the potential 2024 Republican candidate, as aware of his 2020 election defeat.
The Government’s Role
  • Barr highlighted the government’s challenge in proving Trump’s awareness of his loss.
  • An indictment posits that Trump had direct knowledge of his defeat, discrediting any allegations of election fraud.
  • Barr highlighted that the onus is on the government to substantiate this claim indisputably.

Barr said: “The government, in their indictment, takes the position that he had actual knowledge that he had lost the election and the election wasn’t stolen through fraud. And they’re going to have to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Influences on Barr’s Perspective of Trump’s Election Awareness
  • Several factors influenced Barr’s assessment of Trump’s awareness, including some comments from Bannon and Stone prior to the election, which insinuated a prepared narrative of election theft.

“Number one, comments from people like Bannon and Stone before the election saying that he was going to claim it was stolen if he was falling behind on election night and that that was the plan of action. I find those statements very troubling.”

  • While these comments and Trump’s actions on election night might seem damning at first glance, it’s essential to consider them in the context of political strategy and not as an admission of defeat.
  • Charges and indictments that followed could be interpreted as political maneuvering, contributing to what some see as an orchestrated campaign against Trump.
  • Trump’s apparent lack of interest in the minute details should not be misconstrued as guilt, but as a leader’s focus on larger strategic elements.

“And then you see that he does that on election night, and then the evidence that has come out since that, the press reports and the indictment and his lack of curiosity as to what the actual facts were.”


By submitting this form, I hereby consent to TrumpTrainNews.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which permits TrumpTrainNews.com and its affiliates to contact me.