A new accuser has stepped forward alleging sexual misconduct by Supreme Court nominee. The loosely based allegation does not seem to add up and one of the authors has stated that the alleged ‘victim’ only came forward because the Democrats came looking.
In a piece by the New York Times, the new allegation was discussed, but they buried the fact that the woman was not sure it was Kavanaugh and they were not able to corroborate her story over the last week.
According to the New York Times:
Judge Kavanaugh’s prospects were further clouded on Sunday when The New Yorker reported on a new allegation of sexual impropriety: A woman who went to Yale with Judge Kavanaugh said that, during a drunken dormitory party their freshman year, he exposed himself to her, thrust his penis into her face and caused her to touch it without her consent.
In a statement, Judge Kavanaugh denied the allegation from the woman, Deborah Ramirez, and called it “a smear, plain and simple.” The New Yorker did not confirm with other eyewitnesses that Judge Kavanaugh was at the party.
The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge. Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.
The Times also discussed the problems with the witnesses named by Kavanaugh’s first accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford:
Two other potential witnesses identified by Dr. Blasey — who she says were not in the room at the time of the assault — have provided statements to the Judiciary Committee to the same effect. One man, Patrick J. Smyth, told committee Republicans in a letter last week that he had “no knowledge of the party in question.” And a woman, Leland Keyser, told the Republicans through a lawyer that she “does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”
This information further bolsters the assumption this is a witchhunt by the left and this is nothing more than a conspiracy. The truth is important here, but it seems to become more diluted by the day.
