New Information About Odessa Shooter Destroys Dems Anti-Gun Narrative

  • 2019-09-06
  • Source: TTN
  • by: TTN Staff
New Information About Odessa Shooter Destroys Dems Anti-Gun Narrative
By KAZ Vorpal (Flickr: Declaration of Independence, with Firearm) [CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
 
Democrats were using the fact that the Odessa shooter failed a background check but was still able to purchase a firearm in a private sale to illustrate the need for universal background checks.

New information destroys this narrative.

The Odessa shooter did fail a background check, but the private purchase he made was from a person who was illegally manufacturing and selling without a license.

This was simply a criminal act -- an illegal sale --, not a background check loophole.

This type of sale would have been possible regardless of any background check laws being in place.

According to Town Hall:

Over the Labor Day weekend, Seth Aaron Ator shot and killed seven people. He wounded more than 20 others in his senseless rampage. Police killed him during his attack. Ator was a man marked with mental illness. As they searched his home, police noted that this man was on a downward spiral, which apparently culminated when he was fired from his job the day he committed his heinous crime. As the anti-gun Left mobilized again, many questions remained. How did Ator get a rifle? He failed a previous background check via mental health adjudication. Well, it seems Ator obtained his firearms from someone who might have been illegally manufacturing and selling guns without a license. Firearms reporter Stephen Gutowski of the Washington Free Beacon had a good thread about this development, notably that it’s legal for a law-abiding citizen to build his own firearms for personal use/protection, but not with the intention of selling it to others. He went into some of the ATF statutes concerning what “in the business” means to the government concerning firearms sales, but added that regardless of the gray area—what this individual did as reported by the Journal concerning his transfer to Ator was “blatantly illegal”:

...


As of now, federal law enforcement officials are searching the home of the man in question, but the fact remains that background checks worked. Ator was denied. He appears to have gone outside the law to obtain a gun. There’s nothing expanded background checks can do about that or any talking point that’s peddled by Democrats after these tragedies. There was no loophole and private sales aren’t the reason why we have mass shootings. The laws on the books prevented Ator, a prohibited person, from buying a gun. It looks like he, along with his alleged illegal gun maker, had to break the law in order from him to obtain a weapon. 

  Until the left learns more about firearms and the fact that criminals will always have them, maybe they should sit this one out.

 Source: TTN

People, Places & Things

Article Index
X